When challenging a public authority’s decision in the UK, one of the most significant legal remedies available is judicial review. This process allows individuals to ask the court to examine whether a public body acted lawfully and fairly when making a decision. Central to this process is the judicial review claim form, the formal document that initiates proceedings in the Administrative Court.

Completing the judicial review claim form correctly is crucial. Any errors, omissions, or missed deadlines can result in your case being rejected or delayed. At Salam Immigration, we have extensive experience assisting clients through the complexities of judicial review, ensuring their applications are properly structured and supported with the right evidence.

This guide offers detailed, step-by-step instructions on how to complete the judicial review claim form, highlighting common mistakes, procedural requirements, and practical tips for strengthening your application.

Understanding Judicial Review Claims: What Is a Judicial Review Claim Form?

The judicial review claim form (Form N461 in England and Wales) is the official document used to start an application for judicial review in the Administrative Court. This form serves as the foundation of your legal challenge, setting out the decision being contested, the legal grounds for review, and the remedies sought. The claim form must be accompanied by detailed grounds and written evidence to support the claim.

Judicial review is not about re-examining the merits of a decision but about assessing the lawfulness of the decision-making process. For example, in the context of immigration law, a judicial review may be pursued if the Home Office refuses an application without considering relevant evidence or acts outside its legal powers.

The judicial review claim form provides the court with essential information, including:

The identity of the claimant (the person bringing the case).
The defendant (usually a public authority, such as the Home Office).
The specific decision being challenged.
That the claim relates to a public body’s decision made in the exercise of a public function.
The legal grounds on which the challenge is based.
The remedies or relief being sought from the court.

Only those with sufficient interest in the matter can bring an application for judicial review, and any interested party directly affected by the decision must be identified.

Because the judicial review claim form initiates formal court proceedings, precision and clarity are paramount. Mistakes at this stage can have significant consequences for the viability of your case.

When Should You Use a Judicial Review Claim Form?

Understanding when to use a judicial review claim form is essential before embarking on the process. Bringing a judicial review challenge is only possible in limited circumstances, typically when no other adequate legal avenues or alternative remedies are available.

In the UK, a judicial review challenge is designed to contest the lawfulness of a decision-making process carried out by a public authority. It does not serve as an appeal against the decision itself, nor is it a chance to present your case again. Instead, it examines whether the decision-maker acted fairly, legally, and reasonably.

Bringing a judicial review involves a specific legal process designed to ensure that only claims of exceptional public interest or those meeting strict criteria proceed.

Situations Where Judicial Review May Be Appropriate

The judicial review claim form may be used in situations such as:

Immigration refusals where there is no right of appeal or administrative review.
Unlawful detention cases where individuals are held by the Home Office without proper legal basis.
Local authority decisions on housing, benefits, or social care that fail to follow proper procedure.
Public law matters where government bodies exceed their powers or fail to meet statutory obligations.
Challenges to planning permission or other planning decisions, often through a statutory challenge in the Planning Court.

Campaign groups and private bodies performing public functions may also bring or be subject to judicial review claims.

Situations Where Judicial Review May Not Be Suitable

It is equally important to know when judicial review is not the right course of action. Filing a judicial review claim form inappropriately can waste time and money. Judicial review is generally unsuitable when:

A statutory right of appeal exists (e.g., in many immigration decisions). In many immigration cases, decisions of the First-tier Tribunal or Upper Tribunal (including the Upper Tribunal’s decision to refuse permission to appeal) are subject to their own appeal processes and are generally not suitable for judicial review.
The issue is about the merits of the decision rather than the legality of the process.
There are alternative remedies, such as a complaint procedure, tribunal application, or administrative review.

Importance of Legal Advice Before Filing

Before completing and submitting a judicial review claim form, it is highly advisable to seek expert legal advice. At Salam Immigration, we assess whether judicial review is the right strategy, ensuring that clients do not pursue a claim prematurely or without sufficient grounds.

It is crucial to consult legal experts at an early stage to maximize your chances of a successful claim and to develop an effective strategy from the outset.

The court takes misuse of judicial review seriously, and applications without merit may result in wasted costs orders against the claimant. Ensuring the claim is suitable avoids these risks and strengthens your overall case.

The Structure of the Judicial Review Claim Form (N461)

The judicial review claim form is formally known as Form N461 in England and Wales. This document must be completed with care, as it provides the Administrative Court with the key details of your case. Each section of the form serves a specific purpose, and missing information can cause delays or even lead to rejection.

Section 1: Claimant Details

This section requires the claimant’s personal information, including:

Full name
Date of birth
Address for service (where official correspondence will be sent)
Contact details such as telephone and email

If the claimant has legal representation, the solicitor’s details are also included here. Accuracy is essential, as mistakes in addresses or contact details could result in missed court notices.

Section 2: Defendant Details

The defendant in a judicial review is usually a public authority. In immigration cases, for example, this will often be the Secretary of State for the Home Department. The defendant may also be a government department or a part of the civil service responsible for the decision. The form requires:

Full name of the defendant
Their official address for service
Any additional parties if more than one authority is being challenged

Section 3: The Decision Being Challenged

This is one of the most critical sections of the judicial review claim form. It requires:

A clear statement of the decision being challenged (e.g., refusal of an asylum claim or decision to detain).
The date of the decision.
Copies of the decision letter or notice as supporting documents.

Providing a precise description avoids ambiguity and ensures the court knows exactly what is under review.

The claim form should also clearly identify the conduct complained of, specifying the actions or omissions of the public authority that are being challenged.

Section 4: Grounds for Judicial Review

Here, the claimant must outline the legal basis of the challenge. Common grounds include:

Illegality – where the decision-maker acted outside their legal powers.
Irrationality – where the decision is so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could have made it.
Procedural unfairness – where the claimant was denied a fair hearing or proper process.
Proportionality – particularly relevant in human rights cases, where the decision’s impact outweighs its justification.
Breach of legitimate expectation or natural justice – where a public body fails to meet a reasonable expectation it has created, or where fundamental principles of natural justice, such as the right to be heard and absence of bias, are not observed.

This section requires careful drafting, as the strength of your grounds will heavily influence the court’s decision to grant permission for judicial review.

The Human Rights Act 1998 also provides an additional ground for judicial review, allowing claimants to challenge decisions by public authorities that are incompatible with Convention rights.

Section 5: Remedy Sought

In this section, the claimant specifies what they want the court to do if the judicial review succeeds. Remedies may include:

Quashing order – setting aside the decision.
Mandatory order – requiring the authority to act in a certain way.
Prohibiting order – preventing the authority from acting unlawfully.
Declaration – clarifying the claimant’s legal rights.
Injunction – temporarily stopping the decision from being implemented.

Quashing orders may be issued with retrospective or prospective effect, and recent reforms allow courts to suspend or limit the impact of quashing orders to address the consequences of unlawful decisions.

Section 6: Supporting Documents

The judicial review claim form must be accompanied by supporting evidence, such as:

The decision letter being challenged.
Witness statements.
Relevant correspondence.
Any additional legal or factual evidence.

Failure to attach necessary documents is a common reason for rejection.

Claimants must file evidence in accordance with court rules, and failure to do so may result in the claim being rejected.

Section 7: Statement of Truth

Finally, the claimant (or their solicitor) must sign a statement of truth, confirming that the facts set out in the claim form are accurate to the best of their knowledge. Providing false or misleading information here can result in severe consequences, including contempt of court.

At Salam Immigration, we guide clients through every part of the judicial review claim form to ensure accuracy, completeness, and compliance with legal requirements.

Pre-Action Protocol Before Submitting the Judicial Review Claim Form

Before you file a judicial review claim form, the court requires that you attempt to resolve the dispute through what is known as the Pre-Action Protocol (PAP). This stage is not just a formality — it is a critical step that demonstrates to the court that you have tried to avoid litigation where possible.

What Is the Pre-Action Protocol?

The Pre-Action Protocol is a procedure that takes place before a judicial review claim is lodged. Its purpose is to:

Encourage the early exchange of information between the claimant and the defendant.
Enable the defendant to reconsider or rectify its decision without court intervention.
Narrow down the issues in dispute if the matter proceeds to court.
Save both time and legal costs by resolving matters efficiently.

The Pre-Action Protocol Letter (Letter Before Claim)

The central feature of the Pre-Action Protocol is the Letter Before Claim (LBC). This letter is sent to the public authority whose decision is being challenged and must include:

The claimant’s details.
The details of the decision being challenged.
The legal grounds for the proposed claim.
The remedy being sought (for example, withdrawal of the decision).
A reasonable deadline for the defendant to respond (usually 14 days).

The Letter Before Claim should also identify any interested parties who may be directly affected by the outcome of the judicial review.

This letter puts the authority on notice and gives them the opportunity to resolve the matter without judicial proceedings.

Why Is the Pre-Action Protocol Important?

Courts take the Pre-Action Protocol very seriously. If you fail to comply with it, you may face:

Rejection of your judicial review claim form.
Delay in proceedings.
Cost penalties, where the court may order you to pay the defendant’s legal costs even if you later succeed.

Therefore, a properly drafted Letter Before Claim is essential. At Salam Immigration, our team ensures that all pre-action correspondence is precise, comprehensive, and strategically structured to protect our clients’ position.

Situations Where the Pre-Action Protocol May Be Skipped

In rare cases, the court may allow you to skip the Pre-Action Protocol, particularly if:

There is an urgent need for interim relief (for example, stopping an imminent removal from the UK).
Delay would cause irreparable harm.

Even in these cases, you must explain clearly in your judicial review claim form why the Pre-Action Protocol was not followed.

Time Limits for Filing a Judicial Review Claim Form

One of the most important aspects of judicial review is timing. Even if you have strong grounds, failing to submit your judicial review claim form within the required period can lead to automatic rejection of your claim. The Administrative Court enforces strict deadlines to ensure that challenges are brought promptly and efficiently.

The General Rule

Under the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR Part 54), a judicial review claim must be filed:

Promptly, and
In any event, no later than three months after the grounds for the claim first arose.

This means that even if you are technically within three months, the court may still refuse your claim if it considers that you delayed unreasonably.

Specific Deadlines in Immigration and Asylum Cases

In immigration and asylum matters, the time limits are even stricter. You must usually file your judicial review claim form:

Within 3 months of the decision being challenged, but
Promptly in cases where removal or detention is involved.

In some cases, challenges to immigration decisions may be brought before the Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the Upper Tribunal, which has its own procedural rules and time limits.

For example, if the Home Office issues removal directions, you may need to act urgently, sometimes within days, to prevent deportation.

Why Prompt Action Matters

The principle behind these deadlines is fairness and efficiency. Public authorities and courts expect challenges to be raised quickly so that decisions are not left in limbo. Delays can:

Undermine the credibility of your claim.
Increase legal costs.
Lead to refusal of permission for judicial review.

Extensions and Exceptional Circumstances

In limited cases, the court may consider extending the time limit for filing a judicial review claim form. However, this is only granted where:

There is a very good reason for the delay (e.g., serious illness).
The delay has not prejudiced the defendant.
The claim itself raises strong legal grounds of public importance.

Extensions may also be considered in cases of exceptional public interest, where the conduct complained of has significant public importance.

Even then, extensions are rare. The safer approach is always to act within the set deadlines.

Practical Advice

At Salam Immigration, we advise clients not to wait until the last moment. Preparing a judicial review claim form takes time, as it involves drafting grounds, gathering evidence, and complying with pre-action protocol. Acting quickly gives you the best chance of success.

How to Complete the Judicial Review Claim Form Step by Step

Filling in the judicial review claim form (N461) is more than a matter of paperwork — it sets the foundation for your case before the Administrative Court. Accuracy, clarity, and compliance with procedure are essential. The claim form must include detailed grounds for the claim, clearly setting out the legal and factual basis for the challenge. Below is a structured walkthrough to guide you through the process.

Step 1: Provide Claimant Information

Start by entering the claimant’s details. This includes:

Full name and date of birth
Residential address and correspondence address (if different)
Contact details (email and telephone number)
If represented, your solicitor’s name, address, and reference number

Ensure that the address for service is accurate, as this is where the court will send all official correspondence.

Step 2: Identify the Defendant

The defendant is typically the public authority responsible for the decision being challenged. For immigration matters, this is usually the Secretary of State for the Home Department. Local authorities are also frequently named as defendants in judicial review claims, particularly in cases involving housing, social care, or planning decisions. Write:

The full name of the defendant
Their official service address (for government departments, this is often a Treasury Solicitor or Home Office legal team)

Step 3: Specify the Decision Being Challenged

Clearly describe the decision that you want reviewed, including:

The nature of the decision (e.g., refusal of asylum, decision to detain, refusal of further leave to remain)
The date of the decision
The reference number if applicable

Attach a copy of the decision letter or notice to support this section.

Step 4: Set Out the Legal Grounds

This section is the heart of your claim. You must explain why the decision was unlawful. Common grounds include:

Illegality – the decision-maker acted beyond their legal powers.
Irrationality – the decision was unreasonable to an extreme degree.
Procedural unfairness – the process was biased, or you were not given a fair hearing.
Breach of human rights or EU law – where applicable.

When setting out your legal grounds, you should reference any relevant primary legislation that underpins the decision or the challenge.

Each ground should be backed up with factual details and legal principles. Vague or weak grounds can result in refusal at the permission stage.

Step 5: State the Remedy You Are Seeking

The judicial review claim form asks what you want the court to do. Possible remedies include:

Quashing order – to set aside the decision.
Mandatory order – compelling the authority to take a specific action.
Prohibiting order – preventing the authority from acting unlawfully.
Declaration – clarifying the claimant’s legal position.
Injunction – stopping an immediate action, such as removal from the UK.

Step 6: List Supporting Documents

Your claim must include all relevant documentation. This usually consists of: Pre Action Protocol Judicial Review

The decision letter
Witness statements (from you and supporting parties)
Pre-action protocol correspondence
Relevant legal materials or policy references
Any additional evidence demonstrating the impact of the decision

Failure to provide supporting evidence may lead the court to refuse permission for your claim.

Step 7: Confirm Compliance with Pre-Action Protocol

The claim form requires you to confirm whether the Letter Before Claim was sent and whether the defendant responded. If you skipped this stage due to urgency, you must explain why.

Step 8: Sign the Statement of Truth

At the end of the judicial review claim form, you must sign a statement of truth. This declaration confirms that the facts provided are true to the best of your knowledge. Misleading the court can result in serious legal consequences, including contempt of court.

Completing the judicial review claim form thoroughly and accurately is crucial to the success of your case. At Salam Immigration, we ensure that every detail is carefully prepared, backed by evidence, and legally sound to give our clients the strongest possible foundation.

Common Mistakes When Completing the Judicial Review Claim Form

Many judicial review claims fail not because the claimant lacked a strong case, but because the judicial review claim form was filled out incorrectly or incompletely. Avoiding these errors is just as important as presenting solid legal grounds.

Mistakes in the claim form can lead the court to refuse permission to proceed with the judicial review, preventing the case from advancing to a full hearing.

Incomplete or Inaccurate Claimant Details

One of the simplest yet most damaging mistakes is failing to provide complete personal information. Missing addresses, incorrect dates of birth, or inconsistent details between the claim form and supporting documents may cast doubt on your credibility. Always double-check before submission.

Misidentifying the Defendant

It is essential to correctly name the defendant. In immigration cases, this is usually the Secretary of State for the Home Department. Naming the wrong party can result in dismissal, wasting time and resources. For more information on Judicial Review claims and proper procedure, expert guidance is crucial.

Weak or Vague Legal Grounds

Perhaps the most critical error is presenting grounds for review that are too general or lack legal support. Phrases such as “the decision is unfair” without reference to case law, statutory provisions, or established judicial review principles are unlikely to succeed. Every claim must be anchored in legal reasoning.

A decision will only be considered irrational if it is so unreasonable that no sensible person could have made it.

Missing or Insufficient Evidence

Submitting a claim without attaching the decision letter, pre-action correspondence, or supporting witness statements will undermine your case. The court needs evidence to assess whether your arguments have merit. A claim form without documentation is rarely granted permission.

Ignoring the Pre-Action Protocol

Courts expect claimants to attempt to resolve disputes through the pre-action protocol before filing a judicial review. Failure to send a Letter Before Claim — or not explaining why it was not possible — can result in your claim being rejected or costs being awarded against you.

Poorly Drafted Statement of Truth

The statement of truth is not a formality — it is a legally binding declaration. If the statement is missing, unsigned, or misleading, your entire claim may be struck out. This mistake can also expose you to penalties for contempt of court.

Missing the Deadline

Judicial review claims must be filed promptly, and in any case within three months of the decision. Submitting after this period without exceptional justification usually results in automatic rejection. Many applicants lose their chance simply because they failed to act quickly.

At Salam Immigration, we have seen how small errors can derail otherwise strong cases. By providing professional support, we ensure that every judicial review claim form is complete, accurate, and legally persuasive.

Practical Tips for Successfully Submitting the Judicial Review Claim Form

Completing the judicial review claim form is not only about filling in the right boxes; it is about building a legally sound and persuasive application. Judicial review proceedings involve strict procedural requirements and careful preparation at every stage. These practical tips will help ensure your claim is both strong and compliant with court expectations.

Be Prompt and Organised

Judicial review is time-sensitive. Claims must be filed within three months of the decision being challenged, but courts also expect you to act promptly. The sooner you prepare and submit your application, the stronger your case appears. Procrastination creates the risk of refusal, even within the three-month limit.

Seek Legal Advice Early

The complexity of judicial review means that professional guidance can be the difference between success and failure. An immigration solicitor can:

Assess whether judicial review is the right remedy
Draft clear, persuasive legal grounds
Ensure all documents are properly prepared
Represent you in correspondence with the Home Office and in court

The legal aid agency may provide funding for eligible claimants, making legal advice and representation more accessible.

At Salam Immigration, we provide tailored support to strengthen every stage of the process.

Draft Clear and Specific Legal Grounds

Avoid vague claims such as “the decision was unfair”. Instead, be precise: explain how the decision breached procedural fairness, exceeded statutory powers, or conflicted with human rights law. Specificity demonstrates to the court that your claim has a strong legal foundation.

Prepare Evidence Thoroughly

Your claim is only as strong as the documents that support it. Ensure that you provide:

The decision letter you are challenging
Any pre-action correspondence
Witness statements and supporting evidence
Relevant legal references or case precedents

Well-structured evidence builds credibility and convinces the court to grant permission.

Pay Attention to Formatting and Details

While substance matters most, presentation is also important. Judges and court officials deal with large volumes of claims. A well-organised claim form with clear references, concise language, and correctly numbered attachments makes your case easier to follow and strengthens its impact.

Budget for Fees and Costs

Filing a judicial review requires court fees, and there is always a risk of paying costs if your claim is unsuccessful. Applicants should be prepared financially. Seeking advice about potential fee exemptions or funding options early can help manage this burden.

Always Sign and Date the Statement of Truth

Finally, never underestimate the importance of the statement of truth. Failing to sign or misrepresenting facts can undermine your credibility and result in dismissal of your claim. Treat this section with care and honesty.

By following these practical steps, you enhance your chances of submitting a successful judicial review claim form. With proper preparation and expert legal support, your case stands a stronger chance of being heard and decided fairly.

The Role of Legal Representation in Judicial Review Applications

Judicial review is one of the most complex areas of administrative and immigration law. While individuals can, in theory, complete the judicial review claim form without legal support, the risks of errors, omissions, and weak arguments are high. Professional representation ensures that the application is comprehensive, legally sound, and persuasive.

Judicial review claims are typically heard in the senior courts, such as the High Court and its King’s Bench Division, which have specialist judges and procedures for handling these cases.

Expert Assessment of Eligibility

A solicitor will begin by assessing whether judicial review is the right route. Sometimes, an appeal or an administrative reconsideration may be a more effective remedy. This initial assessment saves time and resources by directing clients towards the best legal solution.

Drafting Clear Legal Grounds

One of the most valuable contributions of a solicitor is the drafting of legal arguments. Solicitors understand how to:

Identify breaches of statutory duty or public law principles
Highlight procedural unfairness or unlawful bias
Frame arguments in line with case law and legal precedents
Present grounds that are detailed, persuasive, and within the accepted scope of judicial review

Without this expertise, claimants risk having their applications refused at the permission stage.

Ensuring Compliance with Protocols

Legal representatives ensure that the pre-action protocol is followed. This includes sending a Letter Before Claim and waiting for an adequate response from the Home Office or other public authority. Courts view compliance with these procedures as evidence of professionalism and seriousness.

Managing Evidence and Documentation

A solicitor helps gather and present evidence effectively. They ensure that:

The correct decision letter is attached
Witness statements are properly drafted
All supporting materials are included in a structured format
Legal references are accurately cited

This prevents common mistakes that weaken claims, such as missing attachments or poorly organised submissions and failing to follow procedural requirements.

Representation in Court

If the claim proceeds, legal representation becomes invaluable. Solicitors and barristers can:

Present arguments effectively before a judge
Handle procedural challenges raised by the defendant
Cross-reference case law and human rights principles
Respond quickly to unexpected developments during hearings

Legal representatives play a crucial role in preparing for the substantive hearing or full hearing, where the court examines all grounds of the case in detail, evaluates evidence, and considers legal arguments before making a final decision.

Without such support, claimants are at a significant disadvantage against experienced government lawyers.

Providing Ongoing Advice and Support

Judicial review can be stressful and uncertain. A solicitor does more than just prepare paperwork; they guide clients through each stage, advising on potential outcomes, costs, and next steps if the claim is unsuccessful. This guidance helps clients stay informed and prepared.

Judicial Review Claim Form Costs and Funding Options

Submitting a judicial review claim form is not just a legal exercise but also a financial commitment. Applicants must budget for court fees, solicitor fees, and potential cost risks if their claim is unsuccessful. Understanding the financial aspects in advance helps avoid unpleasant surprises and ensures informed decision-making.

Court Fees for Judicial Review

The Administrative Court requires applicants to pay fees at different stages of the judicial review process. These include:

Filing the claim form – a fee is charged when the N461 claim form is submitted.
Permission stage – if your case proceeds to the permission stage, additional fees may apply.
Oral hearing – if permission is refused on the papers and you request an oral hearing, a further fee is payable.

These fees are subject to change, so it is important to consult the latest guidance from HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS).

Solicitor and Legal Representation Fees

Solicitors charge for the preparation of the judicial review claim form, drafting legal grounds, correspondence, and court representation. Costs vary depending on the complexity of the case and the level of legal support required. While legal fees can be significant, they are often the difference between a rejected and a successful claim.

Cost Risks if the Claim Fails

One of the most important financial considerations is the risk of being ordered to pay the defendant’s legal costs if the claim fails. Since the defendant is often a government body represented by experienced legal teams, these costs can be substantial. Applicants must therefore weigh the strength of their case before proceeding.

Fee Exemptions and Reductions

Applicants with limited financial means may be eligible for fee remission, sometimes called the “Help with Fees” scheme. This allows individuals to apply for exemption or reduction of court fees, depending on their income and savings. Evidence of financial circumstances will be required.

Legal Aid Funding

In certain immigration and human rights cases, legal aid may be available to cover the costs of judicial review. Eligibility depends on the applicant’s financial situation and the merits of the case. Legal aid can provide access to justice for those who might otherwise be unable to afford representation.

Private Funding and Instalments

For those who do not qualify for fee remission or legal aid, some law firms offer flexible payment options. These may include:

Staged payments tied to the progress of the case
Instalment plans for solicitor fees
Fixed-fee arrangements for specific services such as drafting the claim form

Claimants from the private sector, such as businesses or private individuals, may need to arrange private funding for judicial review claims.

These arrangements help applicants manage costs more effectively.

At Salam Immigration, we ensure our clients are fully informed about all financial aspects of submitting a judicial review claim form. From explaining court fees to advising on funding options, we prioritise transparency so that applicants can proceed with confidence.

Judicial Review Claim Form: Time Limits and Deadlines

The importance of timing in judicial review cannot be overstated. Even a well-prepared judicial review claim form can fail if it is filed late. Courts place great emphasis on timeliness, viewing it as essential for fairness, efficiency, and certainty in public decision-making.

The Three-Month Rule

By law, a claim for judicial review must be filed promptly, and in any case no later than three months after the decision being challenged. This is a strict limit. For example:

If the Home Office refuses an immigration application on 1st January, the judicial review claim form must be submitted by 31st March at the latest.

Filing even one day late can result in automatic rejection unless exceptional circumstances exist.

What “Promptly” Really Means

Although three months is the maximum, the requirement to act “promptly” means that claims may still be refused if filed late within the three-month window. Courts expect claimants to begin proceedings as soon as reasonably possible, especially where urgent matters such as removal or detention are concerned.

Urgent Applications

In cases where removal from the UK is imminent or detention is ongoing, urgent judicial review applications may be made. This requires a request for urgent consideration alongside the claim form, supported by detailed evidence explaining why the case cannot wait.

Extensions of Time

Extensions are rarely granted. The claimant must prove that the delay was unavoidable and that refusing the claim would cause serious injustice. Even then, courts are cautious about allowing late applications.

Ensuring Success with the Judicial Review Claim Form

Completing the judicial review claim form is not simply an administrative task — it is the foundation of your case before the Administrative Court. Judicial review relates to the lawfulness of decisions made by public authorities, rather than the merits of the decisions themselves. From identifying the correct defendant and setting out precise legal grounds to attaching supporting evidence and filing within strict deadlines, every detail matters.

Common mistakes such as vague arguments, missing documents, or filing outside the time limit can undermine even the strongest claims. Such claims require careful preparation and strict adherence to procedural rules. For this reason, professional legal representation is highly recommended. Solicitors provide expertise in drafting persuasive grounds, complying with pre-action protocols, and managing costs and risks.

At Salam Immigration, we guide clients through each stage of the judicial review process with precision and care. Whether you are challenging an unfair immigration decision, a refusal of leave, or another unlawful action by a public authority, our team ensures that your claim is filed correctly, within time, and with the strongest possible legal foundation.

Judicial review is a powerful remedy — but only when approached with accuracy, timeliness, and expertise. With the right preparation, your judicial review claim form can be the first step towards justice.

Get expert help filing your Judicial Review claim today.

Visa · Settlement · Legal Support